Assets Reference Public

Caretakers & Establishments

Naming the person answerable for equipment held by an office, a team, a project or an outside party — appointing a primary caretaker, handing the role over, the establishment workspace, and the nightly check that finds rosters pointing at people who have left.

Guide version: r1 Module version: 1.11.0 Updated: 2026-08-25 Estimated time: 5 min 6 views 0% helpful
Custody & Service

Caretakers & Establishments

A person can be answerable for a laptop. A branch office cannot. When equipment is held by a place, a team, a project or an outside company, somebody still has to be the name on the record — and that name is the caretaker.

Why this exists

Assets go to non-people all the time: a projector belongs to Meeting Room 2, a set of tools sits with the Field Operations team, three laptops are out with a contractor. Recording only "Meeting Room 2" answers where and never answers who — and "who" is the entire question when something goes missing, when an auditor asks, or when the equipment has to come back.

ℹ️
A caretaker is not a second owner. The office still holds the equipment; the caretaker is the human answerable for it. That is why the asset list keeps showing the caretaker's name in the "issued to" column — so every existing screen, report and reminder that was built to point at a person keeps pointing at one.

The three roles

RoleWhat it meansHow many
Primary caretakerThe one answerable name. Reminders, return requests and acceptance all land on this person.Exactly one in force at a time, per place/team/project.
Backup caretakerSomebody who can act while the primary is away. Carries no accountability of their own.Any number.
Accountable ownerThe manager who answers for the whole location or team, above the day-to-day caretaker.Any number.

"Exactly one primary" is enforced by the system, not by discipline — a second appointment while one is already in force is refused with an explanation naming the person who currently holds it. Two people who both believe they are answerable is the same as nobody being answerable.

When a caretaker is compulsory

Handing equipment to anything that is not a person asks for a caretaker on the endorsement itself — you cannot complete the handover without naming one. That is asset_caretaker_required_for_non_user, on by default. Turning it off is available for companies that genuinely track equipment by location only, but it removes the one name a chase-up can be addressed to.

Appointing one

Safekeep → Custody → Caretakers. The tab shows every place, team and project that currently holds equipment, the caretaker on each, and — first, in red — the ones holding equipment with nobody named. That gap list is the point of the page; everything else is reference.

Candidates are not a free list of all staff. For an office the picker offers the people actually assigned to it; for a team, its members; for a project, the people on it. Naming somebody from an unrelated department as the caretaker of a branch office is usually a mistake, and offering it as an easy default is how it happens.

Handing the role over

People move on, and the roster has to move with them. Replacing a primary caretaker is a handover, not an edit: the outgoing person's record is closed with a reason and the incoming person is invited to take it on.

Proposed
the successor is named
Awaiting acceptance
they are asked to confirm
In force
they are now the answerable name

Asking for confirmation is the default (asset_caretaker_assumption_requires_acceptance). Becoming answerable for a room full of equipment is not something that should happen to somebody silently while they are on leave — and a refusal, with its reason, is far more useful than a roster that looks correct and is not.

⚠️
Direct appointment exists for the case that needs it. When the outgoing caretaker has already left, waiting for anybody's confirmation just leaves the equipment unattributed. Staff with the caretaker permission can appoint directly; the record shows plainly that it was an appointment rather than an acceptance, because those are different facts.

The establishment workspace

Clicking a place opens its own page: what it holds, who its caretakers are, endorsements it has not confirmed yet, and its recent activity — four tabs, each loaded only when you open it.

It is a workspace, not a report. Everything a branch manager does about equipment — see what is here, see who is answerable, chase what has not been confirmed — is on one page rather than scattered across four filtered lists.

Who can see which establishments

By default anyone who can see custody can see every establishment. Switching on asset_enforce_establishment_scope narrows it: you see the places you are assigned to and the ones you are caretaker of, and staff holding View all establishments still see everything. It ships off because most companies do not want a branch manager blind to the warehouse — but the option is there for the ones that do.

The nightly check

Every night the system looks for rosters that have quietly stopped being true and raises them:

  • Caretakers who have left — a primary caretaker whose account is no longer active. The roster is flagged and the people who can fix it are told once, not nightly; a warning that arrives every day becomes a warning nobody reads.
  • Equipment with nobody answerable — a place or team holding assets with no caretaker in force, which is what the gap list on the Caretakers tab shows.

Neither is repaired automatically. Deciding who becomes answerable for somebody else's equipment is a decision, and the system's job is to make sure a human is asked to make it.

Was this guide helpful?

Report a content problem